Re: [boost] De Bruijn Bind (alternate bind syntax) Interest?

david, why do you need to number the lambdas? doesn't the "nested index" of the args refer to the level of nesting instead of the number given to the lam<> template?

after reading the link larry posted (1), let me correct my question: does lam need to know the number of parameters of the resulting function? Boost.Bind simply ignores additional arguments, and generates a compiler error for insufficient arguments. void f(int,int); bind(&f,3,_1)(1,2); // -> f(3,1) (1) http://bitbucket.org/camior/de-bruijn-bind/src#cl-45