9 May
2013
9 May
'13
4:49 a.m.
On 5/8/13 8:21 PM, Richard wrote:
[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
boost@lists.boost.org spake the secret code <kmcir5$8f5$1@ger.gmane.org> thusly:
Even if it did I would strongly disagree with using a lines of code metric to judge the value of a library.
Isn't the scope of effort a valid point of discussion when considering a *summer* of code proposal, however?
Fair enough, although I still wouldn't agree that LOC = scope of effort. Anyways... Still hoping for a link to said proposal so that the scope of the effort and other things can be discussed.