Alisdair Meredith wrote:
John Maddock wrote:
I've tried converting the TR1 lib to use that implementation but I'm having trouble with the std::pair interface which appears not to work:
Pardon the self-interest, but how does this cope with the less-conforming compilers, such as Borland?
Will we need to retain the original tuple implementation to support a TR1-like implementation? Can they cope with fusion? Or are there too few die-hards like me left to be worth caring about? ;?)
A question for you Borland die-hards is what's up with the state of the compiler? Has it stagnated or are new developments going? I remember applying to be a Borland beta tester some years ago but it fell on deaf ears, and I never looked back again. It seems that they don't care. So why should we care? Don't get me wrong. I used to have a loyalty towards it. I learned my first Pascal program with their original compiler. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net