13 Mar
2005
13 Mar
'05
6:31 p.m.
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:31:08 +0000, Daniel James wrote
Jeff Garland wrote:
However, the fact remains that the date_time library uses non-thread safe functions in a way that cannot be controlled by the user. ...snip details...
Yes, as I said earlier it's on the todo list for 1.33. BTW, worst case is that we could make our own localtime_r function in the clock classes.
I'm not sure about this, but I think that the windows multi-threaded C libraries use thread specific storage for functions like 'localtime'. So on that platfrom, they're okay.
My impresssion as well, although I haven't double checked... Jeff