19 Jan
2011
19 Jan
'11
6:20 p.m.
At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:56:58 +0000, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 19/01/11 16:27, Barend Gehrels wrote:
On 19-1-2011 17:19, Dave Abrahams wrote:
At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:58:09 +0800, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
Although cpp-netlib is there, I'm just not that creative to come up with an alternate name for it. :D cpp-net? :-)
For a library not (yet) in boost, cpp-netlib is appropriate.
As soon as it is in boost, Boost.Net?
We had the same thing, ggl (generic geometry library) became Boost.Geometry because both generic and library were redundant.
Speaking of names and (my) personal preferences, Boost.Image or Boost.Raster would be better than GIL.
+1! -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com