24 Jun
2008
24 Jun
'08
4:35 a.m.
Fully agreed and I didn't mean to suggest otherwise. There will be a small improvement in that distracting and irrelevant details like sizeof won't appear. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 23, 2008, at 6:48 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj@gmail.com> wrote:
AMDG
David Abrahams wrote:
Without knowing anything about how good the error messages are that one gets from static_assert, I'd say "probably.
I rather doubt that implementing BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT in terms of static_assert is going to create significantly better error messages, since it will still be a generic error message.
In Christ, Steven Watanabe
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost