Re: [boost] [C++0x] The cpp0x branch has been merged into trunk

25 Feb 2009

      Hi,
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes@acm.org>
To: "Boost Developers List" <boost@lists.boost.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 7:11 PM
Subject: [boost] [C++0x] The cpp0x branch has been merged into trunk
...
The cpp0x branch has been merged into trunk, enabling a bunch of
BOOST_NO_* macros for C++0x feature tests.
This should have no impact on existing code, so be sure to let me know
if it causes any problems.
What about adding _DELETE and _DEFAULT macros as

#if defined(BOOST_HAS_DELETED_FUNCTIONS)
#define BOOST_COPY_ASSIGNEMENT_DELETE(T)            \
  T& operator=(const T&)=delete;
#else
#define BOOST_COPY_ASSIGNEMENT_DELETE(T)           \
private:                                                                                            \
  T& operator=(const T&);                                                            \
public:

#if defined(BOOST_HAS_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS)
    #define BOOST_DEFAULT_CONSTRUCTOR_DEFAULT(T)        \
      T()=default;                                      \

    #define BOOST_COPY_ASSIGNEMENT_DEFAULT(T)            \
      T& operator=(const T& rhs)=default;               \

#else // !defined(BOOST_HAS_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS)

    #define BOOST_DEFAULT_CONSTRUCTOR_DEFAULT(T)        \
      inline T(){};                                     \

    #define BOOST_COPY_ASSIGNEMENT_DEFAULT(T)            \
      inline T& operator=(const T& rhs) {               \
        T tmp(rhs);                                     \
        swap(tmp);\
        return this;\
      }
#endif // !defined(BOOST_HAS_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS)

of course we will need to change BOOST_HAS_ by BOOST_NO_ on the attached files.

Best,
Vicente

Re: [boost] [C++0x] The cpp0x branch has been merged into trunk

vicente.botet