On 24/10/10 20:06, Christian Henning wrote:
Hi there, I don't see the woods because of all the trees. Could someone get the latest code from here:
http://code.google.com/p/gil-contributions/source/browse/#svn/trunk
and try to compile the following code:
#include <boost/gil/extension/io_new/tiff_all.hpp>
using namespace std; using namespace boost; using namespace gil;
int main() { typedef mpl::vector< gray8_image_t , gray16_image_t , rgb8_image_t , gil::detail::gray1_image_t > my_img_types;
any_image< my_img_types > runtime_image;
read_image( "C:/gil_contributions/test_images/tiff/test.tif" , runtime_image , tiff_tag() );
return 0; }
Why do I have this static assertion in read.hpp[662]? I don't understand why the two buffer types are different.
Any help is very welcome,
Christian, I'm not sure myself, but quick look suggests me there are some related or different problems too: In gil/extension/io_new/formats/tiff/is_allowed.hpp, missing template keyword around line 65 p->template read_data< row_buffer_helper_view< View > >( plane, K ); and missing qualifier around line 800 in: parent_t::init_image( images , this->_info ); In gil/extension/io_new/formats/tiff/is_allowed.hpp, around line 126 compare_channel_sizes_fn fn( &channel_sizes.front() ); does not seem to match any ctor of compare_channel_sizes_fn. There is also mismatch of unsigned short* vs unsigned int*. I will try to continue checking tomorrow. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org Member of ACCU, http://accu.org