John Maddock-3 wrote:
The containers library review is now officially over. However, there are still a few drips a drabs of reviews coming in.... are there any more still pending?
Hi, I had no time to do a review even a minimal one, but as other, I expect the library will be accepted as all the containers merit to be 1st class citizen Boost libraries. For the standard containers I will suggest to have a mode that doesn't use any extension not defined by the standard. I have not a deep opinion on which should be the default behavior, but the standard seems to be a good compromise. For features that are allowed by the standard, but not required, as recursive containers, it will be great if there is a macro that is defined when the library provides the optional feature. Thanks for this big and excellent work. Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/containers-review-A-reminder-that-the-con... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.