John Torjo wrote:
Hi all,
The formal review of the Boost.Functional/Forward library, proposed by Tobias Schwinger, begins today :
Boost.Functional/Forward provides decorator function objects to have an n-ary, generic function object accept both RValues and mutable LValues.
Sorry, this is not a review. Ignore this if irrelevant. Was boost::detail::functionN family in Boost.Accumulators considered? That seems more advanced than Boost.Functional/Forward. FWIW, starting from Abrahams' callable and functionN, I've been implementing a similar library: http://tinyurl.com/vd4r5 , which regards Boost.Functional/Forward facility as one of higher-order functions, `perfect`. BTW, IMHO, Boost.Functional/Forward seems not a good name, because C++0x has `std::forward` which takes not a function but argument! Regards, -- Shunsuke Sogame