On 10/18/2013 12:37 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
On 10/18/2013 06:28 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
On 10/18/2013 11:59 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
On 10/18/2013 05:42 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
The property_map library can be used completely outside of the graph library. What does moving parts of property_map into graph accomplish ?
It makes the property_map library/repo/package not depend on the graph library/repo/package.
The property_map library is a header only library. Please point out to me where in the property_map headers there is any reference to anything in the graph library.
Le-sigh.
I suggest you do your equivalent of this:
boost-trunk/boost/property_map{master}$ git grep boost/graph
I won't ruin the surprise for you by pasting the output.
If you don't understand my point after seeing the output, please just accept that you don't understand the point. No need to respond. A long sub-thread like this is bad.
Thanks for taking the thread off-track and into the human-round-trip zone,
I was in the wrong in that I had not looked at the 'parallel' directory of property_map in order to see that it does indeed have a dependency there on the graph library. Looking at the file 'distributed_property_map.hpp', where the dependency on graph exists, would it not be better to eventually move this and the specializations of distributed_property_map to the graph library so that property_map can then be independent of the graph library. I realize this is more than just moving a file, but rather involves moving the specializations of property map templates for the distributed property map out of their places in property_map to some place under graph. I also realize that this may be beyond what you have tasked yourself to do, but I would really like to see property_map as a library on its own independent of the graph library.