27 Mar
2011
27 Mar
'11
10:15 p.m.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Thomas Heller <thom.heller@googlemail.com>wrote:
On Sunday, March 27, 2011 05:38:23 PM Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
[...]
I don't think think that Boost.Lambda and Boost.Phoenix use the usual C++ syntax to program the "function" body.
Usual is just a point of view.
I don't think it's an unfair point of view; and, at the very least, the first row of the table in [1] is a fair distinction to make between the libraries. Can you suggest an alternative for the first row header of the table? - Jeff [1] http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/local/libs/local/doc/html/boost_local...