-----Original Message----- From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Vicente J. Botet Escriba Sent: 15 June 2014 22:42 To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] date_time -> serialization (Was: spirtit -> serialization)
Le 15/06/14 17:16, Paul A. Bristow a écrit :
-----Original Message----- From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Peter Dimov Sent: 15 June 2014 12:46 To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: [boost] date_time -> serialization (Was: spirtit -> serialization) If someone is using Serialisation then isn't there a very high probability that they are also using DateTime?
So having these in the same package doesn't really matter (except for the artificial level number)?
Looking at the shrink-wrap users, I have a suspicion that this applies quite widely - many people will manage to pull in a big chunk of Boost.
Rearranging the modules isn't going to change this much.
Sub-sub-modules sound Very Evil to me.
Why?
Gut feel ;-)
KISS applies?
KISS <=> without cycles
OK - I can accept this as a goal. But we need to get a release out... Yours Worryingly Paul --- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal UK LA8 8AB +44 01539 561830