15 Jan
2015
15 Jan
'15
2:40 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Павел Кудан <coodan@mail.ru> wrote:
What kind of arguments you would like after all?
Do you really want to discuss misconception of the mathematical class it it's misconcepted terms?!
No, that's irrelvant, we need to stick to the definitions of interval that boost interval claims to use, and discuss if the code adheres to those specs. I.e. way library users will expect and rely upon.
Generic set theoretical discussions are off-topic imo. Ideally you'd post C++ code and show that it doesn't do what you expected based on the documentation, and not based on what you incorrectly think boost interval should be (a set algebra lib)