1 Nov
2013
1 Nov
'13
7:35 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Niall Douglas
On 31 Oct 2013 at 22:13, Andrey Semashev wrote:
I do not see a single good thing in such approach. Developers get frustrated because they are forced to do something even if they don't have resources for it. "Go fix bugs right now or we flush your work to drain" doesn't sound like an encouragement to me.
No work gets flushed. It simply loses peer review approval and reenters sandbox, and therefore ceases to be an officially endorsed part of Boost. To reenter Boost, it can use the fast track peer review process rather than full peer review.
The sandbox is a thing of the past. It won't go away, but will become read-only and of interest only for historical purposes. --Beman