on Mon Oct 27 2008, "Michael G" <mgoldshteyn-AT-comcast.net> wrote:
"David Abrahams" <dave@boostpro.com> wrote in message news:877i7uivdq.fsf@mcbain.luannocracy.com...
... However, we can make it much nicer, e.g.:
for (vertex_iterator pv,ve = xxx(pv,vertices(g)); pv != ve; ++pv) { ... }
My only problem is how to spell xxx. The attached proof-of-concept uses operator%, but I don't feel particularly good about that choice either. Ideas?
I would recommend one of the following, depending on your verbosity comfort level. The vertical bar, | , denotes alternation:
(get|as|to)_iterators get_container_bounds
Again, quite verbose. But maybe BOOST_FOREACH is the right answer anyway; I don't know. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com