Gennaro Prota wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:48:12 +0100, "John Maddock" <john@johnmaddock.co.uk> wrote:
Gennaro Prota wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to point your attention toward the current status of our regression testing. I'll not express opinions, but these are some facts about 1.34: The list is not exhaustive. Nope, my pet hate at present is http://tinyurl.com/jqe7j where the results from one test (an expected failure, marked up) are being listed under a completely different test :-(
Argh :-(
John, while you are here, I saw that you didn't reply about identifying min/max guideline violations in comments being difficult via regexes. That made me think twice, as I supposed it was pretty easy to do with sub_matches or alternation. The basis seems to be "//.*$" for single-line comments and "/\*.*?\*/" for multi-line ones. What am I missing? :-)
Comment looking substring embedded in string constants: const char *x = "/* something"; /* whatever */ And comments within comments: /**/ something /*/ another /**/ /** something(); //*/ another(); /**/ /* something /* another */ Probably more combinations possible :-) -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo