1 Feb
2006
1 Feb
'06
2:34 p.m.
Jody Hagins <jody-boost-011304@atdesk.com> writes:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:26:29 -0500 "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental@thomson.com> wrote:
It's all good and interesting but would you prefer minimal testing component? You stuck with a single BOOST_CHECK tool and couldn't figure out why particular assertion fails. You could use debugger but using BOOST_CHEKK_EQUAL would give you much more change to figure it you quicker without one.
Without a doubt, Boost.Test singlehandedly eliminated one of my biggest objections to test-first coding.
Which objection and how does Boost.Test eliminate it? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com