22 May
2014
22 May
'14
9:29 p.m.
On 22 May 2014 at 15:06, Nevin Liber wrote:
I also proposed in my OP that we skip package management as it's too costly to implement correctly, and go for per-library source distros instead which pushes the version lock problem onto users to solve.
How does significantly increasing the barrier to entry for current and new Boost users help your premise of saving Boost? Besides not agreeing with the premise, I just don't understand how it would do anything but hasten its demise.
I don't get how you get this interpretation. Niall -- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/