26 Dec
2016
26 Dec
'16
12:54 a.m.
On 12/25/16 3:41 PM, Andrey Semashev wrote:
Consider also that whenever a library is accepted into Boost, the matter of backward compatibility appears.
How so? Certainly there is no requirement that boost libraries support older versions of C++ and/or compilers - and indeed many don't. I don't think I see what you're referring to here.
If the accepted library is somehow seriously flawed,
Then of course it should be rejected. Of course reaching a concensus as to whether it's flawed might not be so easy.
I checked this page and don't see where it says anything relevent to your points. Robert Ramey