"Daniel James" <daniel@calamity.org.uk> wrote in message news:cvq8hm$cbj$2@sea.gmane.org... | Thorsten Ottosen wrote: | > I think tr components should be allowed special status. What's the point in | > putting tr components through a normal review, when there can be no interface | > changes? | > | > If the definition of fast-track review is not suitable for tr components, then | > let us call it a | > tr review. The important aspect of such a review is that it should be fast. | | Fast as in soon? Or just spending less time on the review? the latter. | I don't mind | waiting in the review queue so unless anyone really wants to see this in | Boost as soon as possible, I guess that Boost.Hash should be fast | tracked, Boost.Unordered should go in the queue, maybe for a shorter | than normal review. Is that okay with everyone? again, what is the difference---in time-- between a fast-track review and a review that is "a shorter than normal review" ??? -Thorsten