At Wednesday 2004-12-01 14:24, you wrote:
At Wednesday 2004-12-01 06:51, you wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
Charles Schwartz wrote:
Does anyone know of the status of Watcom (http://www.openwatcom.org/) w.r.t. boost compilation?
I don't.
Are there plans to test against this compiler in the future?
That's not the way testing works. At least, the organization doesn't plan to test on a platform or compiler. Some individual volunteers to set up the process that periodically runs the tests and upload them.
(hint, hint: if you'd like to volunteer...) It's now on the to-do list, how's that.
I've installed it and am trying to figure out how to write the base .jam for the compiler (need to read how to use it from the command line 1st, I guess) then I'll add it to my regression collection.
well, I found the docs, and went to compile a small source of my own... no STL files are included: Extensions.cpp(8): Error! E059: col(14) unable to open 'set' given how many parts of the STL are used in boost, which STL is recommended for use with Watcom?
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law" _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"