23 May
2010
23 May
'10
11:22 a.m.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Watanabe" <watanabesj@gmail.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 1:17 AM Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move
AMDG
Terry Golubiewski wrote:
I agree that boost::rv<> should not be in the move_detail namespace. I found using the macros to be annoying and did not use them. I did add...
typedef boost::rv<T>& rv_ref;
... to my movable classes for convenience. I never felt a need for const_rv_ref though.
The main reason for using the macros is to get an automatic upgrade to real rvalue references when they are available.
Why a typedef will not work? Vicente