
5 Nov
2005
5 Nov
'05
4:33 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
pongba <pongba@gmail.com> writes:
Eric Niebler <eric <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
Incrementing the 'BOOST_MPL_..._LIMIT_ARITY'(I forgot the detail though) doesn't help though, because the arity of mpl::apply will increase correspondingly and will always be one more arity than that mpl::lambda can support! It's inherent conflict or inconsistence.
Did I miss any obvious alternative?;-)
Eric can use the appropriate applyN template.
Ah, thanks. Using applyN instead of apply fixes the problem. The fact that apply doesn't work here seems like a bug to me. Is it fixable? -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com