| -----Original Message----- | From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org | [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Gennadiy Rozental | Sent: 11 November 2005 18:45 | To: boost@lists.boost.org | Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Test - yet more mostly spurious warnings. | | > # pragma warning(disable: 4127) // conditional expression is constant. | Is it from lexical_cast? No I think calculation from numeric_limits - looks entirely expected to me. | > # pragma warning(disable: 4180) // qualifier applied to | function type has | > no | > meaning; ignored | > | > at: | > const_string message() const { return !m_message ? | const_string() : | > const_string( m_message->str() ); } | > | > ^^ const not useful? but not wrong. | | Sorry, where is qualifier? Is it objecting to the const? const_string message() const shall I try removing it? | > # pragma warning(disable: 4224) // nonstandard extension used : ... | That I will fix. Thanks Paul -- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB Phone and SMS text +44 1539 561830, Mobile and SMS text +44 7714 330204 mailto: pbristow@hetp.u-net.com www.hetp.u-net.com