11 Jun
2006
11 Jun
'06
2:12 a.m.
"Robert Ramey" <ramey@rrsd.com> writes:
No - it never occured to me to look there. Is this documented anywhere?
No, being in boost/detail, it doesn't have to be. It's not for "public consumption;" just a convenience for Boost developers. See how that works?
David Abrahams wrote:
"Robert Ramey" <ramey@rrsd.com> writes:
I've felt the need for a "lighter weight" version of boost test.
Did you try boost/detail/lightweight_test.hpp ?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com