"Jonathan Turkanis" wrote: [snip]
I think the review should be extended. If you do so, I will commit to writing a review, even though I don't know much about FSMs.
I asked Tom. It is likely. Thanks for interest!
I have not read the FSM reviews yet, but unfortunately IMO even if all the reviews are very favorable there simply have not been enough yet to justify accepting a medium sized library. It looks to me like only four people other than you and Andreas have posted on FSM so far.
The FSM was discussed _a lot_ in the past on this mail-list and Usenet so I expected similar feedback now. Perhaps it could be interpreted: as the library reached mature state where everybody's happy enough. And its not new - for example most of Serialization discussions happened before review. Similarly with multi-index container. I feel current model of reviews is not designed to deal with big libraries well. /Pavel