29 Jan
2009
29 Jan
'09
4:27 p.m.
Barend Gehrels <barend <at> geodan.nl> writes:
If you're building a library piece you probably want the indirect approach. If you've a piece of user code, you probably find the direct approach more readable.
My purpose is to make the indirect approach as/more readable and convenient as the direct one so that the user's won't have to tie their code to the underlying framework's points and boxes (i.e they won't have to deal directly with QPoints at all). It seems that your purpose is rather: Provide lots of algorithms and make them applicable to any type the user is currently working with (the user will still have to know/use QPoints before passing them to the algotithms). Or maybe I missed something?