14 Feb
2008
14 Feb
'08
4:35 p.m.
Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
Zach Laine wrote:
How about: boost::control_flow boost::switch_case ?
(I don't much like either of those, but maybe they'll inspire somebody else).
Well, usually such compile-time versions of familair runtime constructs are called static_*, so how about static_switch?
Well... It's not really a compile time version of a switch statement.
Thanks for the help. I think the best suggestions were control/control_flow although I'm still not entirely happy with them.
boost::functional?