Re: [boost] [Proto] Review

Eric Niebler wrote:

put in a huge effort. I'll put together a detailed response, but for now: s/posit/unary_plus/. :-)

Thanks! Now I can vote for accpetance ;-P I know it is late for that dsicussion, but even if STL has std::plus I'd also like binary_* naming convention where appropriate, say binary_plus, binary_minus, etc. Your mileage may vary. Markus