Re: [boost] C++11 on up Boost libraries

On 12/31/2020 12:50 PM, Paul A Bristow via Boost wrote:

...

-----Original Message----- From: Boost On Behalf Of Hadriel Kaplan via Boost Sent: 31 December 2020 16:15 To: Boost mailing list Cc: Hadriel Kaplan Subject: Re: [boost] C++11 on up Boost libraries

Wow, I have never seen that matrix before - that’s really useful - thanks for the link!

Honestly, a link to that should be prominently displayed on the top boost.org page. I see it now in the development->testing, but that’s kinda buried - especially since most users aren’t looking to develop for boost itself.

Indeed - it is quite well hidden and Google struggles to find it without exactly the right question ☹

I have the develop version bookmarked 😊 and that meets my needs.

But I haven't found the equivalent for each Boost *release*. Since this contains the most detailed test results for each release, should we be keeping a copy of the regression report for master at the time of each release.

Or have I not found these records yet?

I believe that we should point users to these tables in the context of cxxstd support.

Paul

PS I note that the current https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/index.html

Contains a reference to SVN health, but we have been using Git for some time now.

Also the user summary link

https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/user/index.html

Where is this URL found ? The normal links from https://www.boost.org/development/testing.html seem fine to me.

is not working at present

"Error extracting file: Error code 11 - No matching files were found."

This summary is probably a more useful link - but saving for each release would be good.

Should I raise a GitHub issue for this?

...

...

On Dec 31, 2020, at 5:19 AM, Paul A Bristow via Boost wrote:

but I believe that we should also encourage would-be users to consult the regression matrix

https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/summary.html https://www.boost.org/development/tests/master/developer/summary.html

for more detailed info on what is known to work with some confidence based on tests,