30 Jan
2012
30 Jan
'12
6:44 p.m.
on Mon Jan 23 2012, "Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr." <jeffrey.hellrung-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba < vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
at least, I'm guessing thread is pimpl'ed
Reading this surprised me so much that I had to look for myself, and indeed it does seem to be pimpl'ed. My understanding was that the move-only threading components were designed so that they could be implemented as efficiently as possible, without dynamic allocation, and I wonder why Boost's implementation would be less efficient. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com