Olaf van der Spek-3 wrote
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:25 AM, lcaminiti <lorcaminiti@> wrote:
It would be for ScopeExit, LocalFunction, OverloadedFunction, and IdentityType because these libraries have been ready for a while (regression tested on all compilers, reviewed by managers and other library authors, etc). I didn't merge them into release simply because I was think I still had time and I had been busy at work in the last 2 weeks (I and Vicente asked for a 1.50 release date a few times more than 3 weeks ago but got no answer, not the release was closed the same day it was announced). I put a lot of effort into getting these libraries ready, they are ready, not to include them in 1.50 because of a miss-communication invalidates a large part of the effort I put into developing and testing this libraries...
Isn't that exaggerated? They could go into 1.51.
My point is that a truly put a lot of effort to meet the 1.50 target and that is slipping away for miss-communication, which is rather unfortunate. --Lorenzo -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/1-50-0-Beta-schedule-tp4630328p4630404.ht... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.