Hi Yes that is what worried me, I can't have any operation like lock or classic malloc in my thread. I could use a specific allocator for preallocation, But I would more need a queue like LockFree. and it would obviously be asynchronous, I know that the consequences (problem of message ordering, limis in message rate because of the no allocation on the source side) But that would realy be what I need. Thank you for your answers On 30 April 2013 05:41, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday 30 April 2013 07:32:06 you wrote:
asynchronous_sink<T, unbounded_fifo_queue> uses a lock-free queue internally, so it will avoid locking.
Ughh, I just remembered there is also a lock in this case, so technically it's not lock-free either. Sorry.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost