5 Jul
2005
5 Jul
'05
6:11 p.m.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:35:21 -0700 "Robert Ramey" <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
Of course an alternative would be for <boost/serialization/shared_ptr.hpp> to include .../shared_ptr_132.hpp but I thought people without old archives would object to that - as I would personally.
Sounds like a preprocessor definition should be used instead, and then serialization/shared_ptr.hpp can optionally include the 132 header file, if the apprpriate definition for use-132-shared-ptr exists... This effectively hides it from everyone, and only those who need it would make the appropriate definition...