26 Sep
2005
26 Sep
'05
7:29 a.m.
Simon Buchan wrote:
John Maddock wrote:
Those of a mathematical inclination, might be interested to note that the only substantive code in the TR1 submission currently under review is some proposed additions to Boost.Math: mainly the inverse complex number trig functions.
Just a heads up in case the "TR1" moniker didn't get your attention.
I'm surprised! Perhaps their energies are focused of C++0x?
Gah! Ignore that, I thought that was some sort of review of The TR1 by ISO. Yes, I really am that stupid.