Douglas Gregor wrote:
Boost Regression test failures Report time: 2006-02-07T14:42:00Z
This report lists all regression test failures on release platforms.
Detailed report: http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-HEAD/developer/issues....
The following platforms have a large number of failures: cw-9_4
1787 failures in 35 libraries (374 are from non-broken platforms) numeric/ublas (1) random (5) multi_index (78 of 80 failures are from non-broken platforms) concept_check (24 of 25 failures are from non-broken platforms) functional/hash (44 of 45 failures are from non-broken platforms) iostreams (4) regex (16) graph (8) signals (36) program_options (2 of 9 failures are from non-broken platforms) foreach (12) rational (4) test (15) parameter (22) numeric/conversion (10) typeof (24 of 25 failures are from non-broken platforms) python (61) algorithm/minmax (4) wave (2 of 6 failures are from non-broken platforms) tr1 (115) integer (1) serialization (719 of 1055 failures are from non-broken platforms) optional (22 of 23 failures are from non-broken platforms) spirit (36 of 38 failures are from non-broken platforms) pool (1) xpressive (26) date_time (19 of 26 failures are from non-broken platforms) thread (4) multi_array (12) config (3) algorithm/string (16) ptr_container (12 of 24 failures are from non-broken platforms) math (10) filesystem (43) assign (2)
Hmm… lexical ordering would be nice here. What's the ordering criterion now? Thomas -- Thomas Witt witt@acm.org