Re: [boost] request: BOOST_NO_SFINAE_EXPR macro

Beman Dawes wrote:

Yes! I'd suggest you test with at least one compiler that supports the feature and one that doesn't. But in general just default to BOOST_NO_*.

Ok, here is the patch. I chose to name the macros BOOST_NO_SFINAE_EXPR as I initially suggested and BOOST_NO_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_DEFAULT_PARAMETER since the other suggested name was really too long. I also changed the GCC config header so that GCC 4.4 is not an unknown version anymore.