30 Jan
2007
30 Jan
'07
10:08 p.m.
On 30 Jan 2007, at 20:07, Paul A Bristow wrote:
PS and about your torture test - I don't think this should be the focus of the review.
There are horses for courses, and the not-always-accurate version should be fine for most applications. (If the data are going to be as unreasonable as the torture data are, one could argue that they are wrong!
and that there should have never have been used to calculate a simple mean etc anyway - it needs a robust mean?).
The accumulator library can easily extended by more robust estimators.