Re: [boost] [review][fixed_string] End of review period approaching and a plea

On 2019-12-04 19:01, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:

Vinnie Falco wrote:

...

...

I don't like this change. A special case for close to zero benefit

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 11:42 PM Peter Dimov via Boost wrote: that > changes the semantics of data() to not be unique per instance.

I don't feel strongly about it either way, but since when is data() guaranteed to be unique per instance?

This is a property of the implementation that is no longer true after the change. It may not have been "guaranteed" but it was true.

I don't think it should be guaranteed.