31 Aug
2013
31 Aug
'13
5:22 p.m.
On 8/31/2013 1:13 PM, Mathieu Champlon wrote:
On 31/08/2013 17:14, Phil Bouchard wrote:
It keeps track of the order of construction and so their are deleted in the order of construction so that their members are deleted first.
Did you mean deleted in the reverse order of construction ?
So you have a cyclic list: +-> 1 -> 2 -> 3 -+ | | +----------------+ 1 will be called for destruction first but the pointer to 2 and then 3 will deleted beforehand because they are their members. The pointer of 3 to 1 will be ineffective. -Phil