Re: [boost] Boost 1.49 BOOST_PP_ITERATION_FLAGS(): causes build failures; would like a boost maintainer comment

Paul, Thanks a bunch for the detailed explanation. I think I know how to fix the one package that I know has been broken by this. On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 04:49:26PM +0000, Paul Mensonides wrote:

I suppose that I *could* define all of these (it isn't just BOOST_PP_ITERATION_FLAGS) to have values in the non-iterating case such as:

#define BOOST_PP_ITERATION_FLAGS_0() 0 // etc.

If I were to pursue this option, which other macros would need to be defined? Thanks, -Steve