15 Aug
2011
15 Aug
'11
7:26 p.m.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:56 AM, David A. Greene <greened@obbligato.org>wrote:
Gordon Woodhull <gordon@woodhull.com> writes:
On Aug 13, 2011, at 1:21 PM, "Hartmut Kaiser" <hartmut.kaiser@gmail.com> wrote:
so why not leave the existing MPL alone and start over?
Is there any reason a variadic MPL would have a different interface?
Yep. There are plenty of cases in MPL where variadic interfaces would be useful, sequence construction being a primary one. It is a royal pain to convert a C++11 variadic type list into an MPL vector, for example.
Sorry for the ignorance, but it isn't as simple as boost::mpl::vector< T...
? Or does that indeed qualify as a "royal pain" ?
- Jeff