12 Oct
2011
12 Oct
'11
4:03 p.m.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Matt Calabrese <rivorus@gmail.com> wrote:
To be clear, I do agree that in most cases a user would often prefer the unchecked version (just as how in practice, a user may often be able to use operator[] rather than at()), I only disagree on the name of that function. Perhaps unchecked_push_back is a nasty name, but that can be changed.
What about algorithms that call push_back, like back_inserter? Will you provide them as well? Olaf