16 Dec
2006
16 Dec
'06
5:32 p.m.
Robert Ramey wrote:
Uh oh - I meant to check this into the HEAD only. If this is not the case its a HUGE mistake on my part. Let me look into this.
Robert Ramey
Browsing the online CVS tree looks to me that the changes have been checked into the HEAD and only the HEAD. This is what I intended and I would have thought this was OK. What am I missing here? Is checking into the HEAD affection the RC_1_34_0 branch? Is the RC_1_34_0 somehow dependent on the HEAD.Is it possible that the test RC_1_34_0 test results in RudbekAssociates-V2 are using the head rather than the RC_1_34_0 ? I would be happy to fix it if I knew how. Robert Ramey