[boost] Re: [shared_ptr] possible bug in sp_counted_base.hpp

Rene Rivera wrote:

Peter Dimov wrote:

...

No, because the Win32 implementation on non-MSVC/Intel makes indirect calls to the kernel Interlocked* functions. The g++ version is better.

So that brings up this question..

Would it be preferable to have CodeWarrior on Windows use an assembly implementation? That is have a sp_counted_base_cw_x86.hpp, with the same implementation as sp_counted_base_gcc_x86.hpp.

(ping) Haven't gotten an answer on the question. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org