17 Mar
2017
17 Mar
'17
10:07 a.m.
2017-03-17 10:43 GMT+01:00 Attila Szenczi via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org>:
Hello!
I knew about safe_numerics and i felt like it's different from what i want. (tho i didn't check the whole lib)
However, i didn't know about constrained_value, and it seems like this lib is exactly the same as mine. Even the design decisions are identical... so i reinvented the wheel. :'(
This proves that the library is useful, and there is a demand for it. Your energy and motivation could still be used to get the library into Boost. I can see from the review schedule <http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html> that this constrained_value library was even accepted, but then orphaned. Regards, &rzej;