On 10/4/24 20:21, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
Should one or more of these libraries be marked as "deprecated" in their corresponding meta/libraries.json?
Array Assign Chrono Compatibility compressed_pair enable_if ForEach functional mem_fn move MPL Ratio ResultOf Typeof
To quickly summarize my opinions, which I have already explained at length in other threads: I approve of marking certain older Boost libraries as obsolete. I approve of hiding obsolete libraries by default. I disapprove of ever removing obsolete libraries from Boost 1.x. I approve of a hypothetical Boost 2.x without the obsolete libraries that can be used alongside Boost 1.x. I approve of Boost 2.x using C++ modules from the beginning. I approve of Boost 1.x continuing to get new releases, but gradually being replaced by Boost 2.x in new code. -- Rainer Deyke - rainerd@eldwood.com