From: FlSt@gmx.de
Furthermore I uploaded a new implementation of my junctions calss to the sanbox file vault junction/boost_junction_v8.zip and a draft of a document which describes the junctions from a mathematical view. (It's just a draft and the notation needs to be explained) Lambda is removed from the current version, because to many compilers don't compile this. I'm using boost::bind instead to change the operands order.
I just tried that version tonight. So far, it has taken well over 30 minutes to compile junction_example.cpp, and it's still going. That's on a 3 GHz dual Pentium box running SUSE linux using GCC 3.2.3. By comparison, my test program with my library takes less than a minute. Our libraries are doing very nearly the same thing, though I think there may be a little variation in behavior. Nevertheless, there is something about your test program and library that requires enormous resources. I'll try rewriting my test program to work with your library so we can compare them a little more fairly. I'll let you know what I find. -- Rob Stewart stewart@sig.com Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;