Douglas Gregor wrote:
On Monday 08 March 2004 09:13 pm, Thomas Witt wrote:
Douglas Paul Gregor wrote:
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, E. Gladyshev wrote:
Yes, but it seems that I've omitted any way to get to the combiner. Sounds like something we should add.
That was me, actually;
Yep. FWIW the citation structure is correct it's just that the first line is bogus because all content you cited from E. Gladyshev had been removed. Though I agree it's really misleading. It was an oversight.
The problem is that currently calling remove during a call to a slot connected to the add signal of the container leads to desaster.
This is a problem with the data structure storing the E elements, not Signals itself, right? Signals is designed to be resilient to this type of thing.
Yes, the problem is not a Signals problem.
I'll check in the fix in a few hours.
Thanks Thomas -- Thomas Witt witt@acm.org